World Literature Professional Writing Essay.

World Literature Professional Writing Essay.

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

World Literature Professional Writing Essay.

Paper details:

Please select examples you have found in the types of professional writing you would like to become better in writing. You can just start by posting examples, and you don’t need to worry about doing all of the ones you will eventually want to put. Just get started. As you may have some ideas in your head at the time you find and choose them, please jot those down right away, along with your post to the link or an excerpt of the full text. Let’s try to analyze these examples through the lenses of the first 4 modules. We have already gotten into syntax (Module 1) and lexicon (Module 2), and coming up are Diction/Semantics = Meaning (Module 3), and Rhetoric (venue/situation, purpose, writer’s attitude/tone, audience, etc.).

We will be going back and forth between the models you choose, and deepening our understanding of those concepts of language represented in the modules. You will be writing your own products, and you will be applying what you are learning in Modules 1-4 to the type of writing you are trying to improve in. As students post your models, we may find that there are some categories which form. In that case, we may try to find a way to repost these or to rearrange them into the groups so that we can work more effectively. I’ve already created one model group, called “Grey Literature,” using examples, including guidance/instruction, and models and analyses, of white papers.

I did that because I doubt any of you will want to do a white paper for this course, because it’s a big project (but if you want, please go ahead). So, I wanted to model for you the kind of information there is on the web about one particular type of professional writing. You should be able to find a lot on your own. I want you to search actively and create your own knowledge base, and then I will work with you to improve your writing aimed at those particular projects you define yourselves. Please follow the instructions.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow World Literature Professional Writing Essay.

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!