WMBA 6040 Plan For Continuous Improvement And Increased Capability Essay

July 10, 2021

Plan for Continuous Improvement and Increased Capability Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Choose one of the following possibilities to frame and assess this week’s reading assignment in The Goal, depending on the two course level outcomes below:

Based on an assessment of an organization’s systemic restrictions, create a plan for continual improvement and enhanced capability.

Using management concepts, examine a complex value generating system.

Then, utilizing Part 2 of your The Goal readings, locate and select three brief sections that include one or two key management themes that you found appealing. Use the Course Outcome you chose as a framework to analyze each one. Note: This week, explain why the team’s tactics are effective and how “breaking the rules” in this circumstance makes sense from a systems performance standpoint.

Write a 3- to 4-paragraph essay for this Shared Practice. Identify the Course Outcome and the sections from Part 2 of The Goal that you choose. Explain why the passages you selected are relevant and vital in efficient business management. Justify your response and reference each piece using citations.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met