Why is a risk assessment valuable for an organization?
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Why is a risk assessment valuable for an organization?
- Why is a risk assessment valuable for an organization?
- Helps protect assets
- Helps plan employee vacation timing
- Identifies future capital investments
- Helps protect management
- Which of the following is not a component of the risk assessment process?
- Risk identification
- Risk likelihood
- Risk elimination
- Risk prioritization
- Which of the following is a type of risk assessment?
- Monitoring
- Quantity
- Processing
- Qualitative
- What type of risk assessment uses monetary values to assess a risk?
- Quantitative
- Qualitative
- Ongoing
- Subjective
- What type of risk assessment uses terms such as ALE, SLE, and ARO?
- Delphi
- Risk Matrix
- Quantitative
- Qualitative
- You are analyzing a risk and have determined that the SLE is $1,500 and the ARO is 5. What is the ALE?
- Unable to determine with information given
- $300
- $7,500
- $90,000
- A company issues laptop computers to 100 employees. The value of each laptop including hardware, software, and data is $1,000. On average, employees lose one laptop a month. What is the SLE?
- 12
- 100
- $1,000
- $12,000
- A company issues laptop computers to 100 employees. The value of each laptop including hardware, software, and data is $1,000. On average, employees lose one laptop a month. What is the ARO?
- 12
- 100
- $1,000
- $12,000
- A company issues laptop computers to 100 employees. The value of each laptop including hardware, software, and data is $1,000. On average, employees lose one laptop a month. Management determines that it can
- purchase hardware locks for a total of $1,000 and reduce the number of lost laptops to one per year. Should they purchase the locks?
- Yes, because the savings is greater than the cost of the control.
- Yes, because the cost of the control is greater than the savings.
- No, because the savings is greater than the cost of the control.
- No, because the cost of the control is greater than the savings.
- Senior management has recently reviewed an RA but chose not to accept any of the recommendations. What risk management strategy are they using?
- Risk mitigation
- Profitability
- Survivability
- Risk acceptance
Scenario:
In order to help make better decisions regarding risk assessment data, senior management at YieldMore has requested quantitative information relating to key information technology (IT) assets.
Tasks:
You, as an employee of YieldMore, have been given a task of providing quantitative risk assessment information to senior management.
- Estimate the value of at least five key IT assets in the organization.
- Be sure you consider direct and indirect financial and business impact of the IT assets.
- Calculate the single loss expectancy (SLE) of the IT assets. (For this exercise, you will need to estimate this value.)
- Calculate the annual rate of occurrence (ARO) for risk associated with the IT assets. (For this exercise, you will need to estimate this value.)
- Calculate the annual loss expectancy (ALE) of the IT assets.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Why is a risk assessment valuable for an organization?