Why Dogs Eat Grass Discussion Essay
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Why Dogs Eat Grass Discussion Essay
Help me study for my Social Science class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.
One of the driving forces behind globalization is scientism: a philosophical movement that asserts (1) that everything can be explained in universalistic terms, (2) that the explanations can be tested empirically, and (3) that the explanations can be accessed by human reason. The objective of this week’s assignment is to understand scientism as a driving force behind globalization.
(1) Select one of the following “1000 Most Asked ‘WHY’ Questions on Google” (or pose a why question of your own): https://www.mondovo.com/keywords/1000-most-asked-why-questions-google (Links to an external site.).
(2) Find and share two answers to the question, one based more in science and one based more in folklore (the traditional beliefs, customs, and stories of a community, passed down through word of mouth).
(3) Compare the two answers in terms of globalization. Which one has more global potential? Which one is more portable (i.e., more convincing to more people in more parts of the world). Why?
Why Dogs Eat Grass Discussion Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Why Dogs Eat Grass Discussion Essay