Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper Solution

Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

Fallacy Study Guide Assignment Sheet and Grading Rubric

In order to prepare for the Fallacies Quiz, complete this study guide with original example and memory/visual tools you will use to prepare. In order to complete this study guide, utilize the weekly assigned readings and the Informal Fallacies Appendix on pages 397-404.

If you are struggling to come up with an original fallacy example, consult classmates or use online resources. Fill out the Logical Fallacies study guide completely and turn it into our online classroom.

You are not required to cite any outside materials for this assignment. Even if you are taking images or links from online, for this assignment, I don’t want you to concern yourself with MLA citation.

First and foremost, this is a study guide and personal tool that I want you to use in order to best prepare for the upcoming Fallacy quiz.

I encourage you to draw from course assigned readings, our course textbook, and use any and all online resources to help you memorize all of the logical fallacies.

Remember: For the Fallacy quiz, you need to be able to 1) define each fallacy, 2) identify and classify fallacious arguments and 3) generate examples of fallacies.

Step 1: Download the Logical Fallacies Study Guide Template Step 2: Fill out a definition, fallacy example, and visual or memory tool for each Fallacy type Step 3: Submit Fallacy Study Guide as a .doc or .docx to our online classroom

Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

Criteria Below Expectation (0-9)

Meeting Expectations (10-17)

Outstanding (18-25)

Total Points

Nuts and Bolts

Did student fully complete the fallacy study guide template? Are all 18 Fallacy types identified and did students provide an original and generative example?

Did students carefully craft a memory or visual tool to help facilitate thoughtful studying? This Study guide is for your benefit in order to prepare yourself for the summative Fallacy Quiz. While this assignment is based on completion, points will be awarded based on the breadth, quality, and completeness of your study guide.

__/ 25

Definition Fallacious Example Visual/Memory Tool Example: Appeal to False Authority (ethos): This fallacy happens when you use a popular person, often a celebrity or star, to support your argument despite not having any kinds of expertise/authority. For example, a celebrity might be a popular public figure but might not be qualified to sell or endorse a health product or cultural fad.

Regina George wears pink on Wednesdays and only eats carbs so you should too.

Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

Week 2 Core Argument Structures Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!