Vitamin D Deficiency Discussion Questions
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Vitamin D Deficiency Discussion QuestionsTopic Vitamin D deficiencyThe sun is one of the most important factors that help in getting vitamin D. Qatar is acountry where the sun shines all year long, but many Qataris suffer from vitamin Ddeficiency. Zainal et al. (2019) reported that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiencyamong young adults, females, Qatari nationality and those with high body mass index isvery high.Discuss the following points:What is vitamin D deficiency? (1 point)What are the causes of vitamin D deficiency, particularly in Qatar? (2 point)What are the symptoms of vitamin D deficiency? (1 point)What is your advice to improve vitamin D deficiency? (1 point)Forensic Science AffidavitWrite a one-page affidavit identifying the killer for the court. To justify your identification,note where the DNA samples came from, describe how PCR analysis works (thecomponents, their roles, and the purpose of each step in the reactions), and explainhow you came to your conclusion. The Affidavit does not have to be an official formatteddocument. It can be in the form of a paper as long as it answers all the requiredquestions!Purpose:To explore the science and methodology of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) andits applications in forensic scienceObjectives:Research the concepts and methodologies of PCR (see videos in this folder)Review evidence from a hypothetical criminal investigation and examine PCR profiles ofseveral potential suspectsCompose an affidavit identifying the suspect and the supporting PCR evidenceWhat you will do:Research the concepts and methodologies of PCRReview evidence from a hypothetical criminal investigation and examine PCR profiles ofseveral potential suspectsCompose an affidavit identifying the suspect and the supporting PCR evidenceThe steps to follow:Research the technique and science of PCR, using the suggested videos, and completeDNA Analysis: PCR (file can be found above).Using PCR Profiles: Who Killed Clotilda? (file can be found above), read backgroundinformation on the crime. Compare the PCR profiles derived from crime scene evidenceto those of the victim and the suspects.Write a one-page affidavit, according to the directions in PCR Profiles: Who KilledClotilda?. Justify your identification by discussing the validity of PCR analysis in criminalcases.Vitamin D Deficiency Discussion Questions
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Vitamin D Deficiency Discussion Questions
Vitamin D Deficiency Discussion Questions