Using Grounded theory for theoretical development

Using Grounded theory for theoretical development

Instructions

Using Grounded theory for theoretical development

Grounded theory is a methodology used in the social sciences for the development of theory that is grounded in data. The goal of grounded theory is to generate a theory that explains the relationships and patterns found in the data, rather than imposing preconceived notions or hypotheses on the data.

The process of grounded theory begins with data collection, typically through qualitative methods such as interviews, observations, or document analysis. The data is then analyzed in an iterative process, with the researcher constantly comparing and contrasting the data to identify patterns and relationships. This process is known as open coding, which involves breaking down the data into smaller units of meaning and assigning codes to these units.

As the analysis progresses, the researcher begins to identify categories and themes that emerge from the data. These categories and themes are then compared and contrasted to identify patterns and relationships. This process is known as axial coding, which involves linking the categories and themes to one another to form a more comprehensive understanding of the data.

The final stage of grounded theory is theoretical sampling, in which the researcher continues to collect data specifically to test and refine the emerging theory. This allows for the theory to be grounded in a wide range of data, increasing its credibility and generalizability.

One of the key features of grounded theory is its flexibility and adaptability. The researcher is free to adapt their methods and analysis as new insights and patterns emerge from the data. This allows the theory to evolve organically, rather than being imposed on the data.

Grounded theory has been used in a wide range of fields, including sociology, anthropology, psychology, and management studies. It has been particularly useful in the study of complex social phenomena, such as organizational change and community development.

Overall, grounded theory is a valuable methodology for theoretical development in the social sciences. It allows for the generation of theory that is grounded in data, rather than preconceived notions, and is flexible and adaptable to new insights and patterns as they emerge.

Using Grounded theory for theoretical development

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!