Unveiling Personality: A Comparative Exploration of Psychoanalytic and Trait Theories
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
Unveiling Personality: A Comparative Exploration of Psychoanalytic and Trait Theories
Based on your readings for this Week, access the Personality Theory Matrix and complete the requested information in the Column
B section for Psychoanalytic Theory and Column C section for Trait Theory. You can use this information to support this week’s
Discussion post and response and Assignment.
Note: You will use this spreadsheet to guide your learning about personality theories in Weeks 2-6 and to support your completion of
your Module Assessment. It will also be submitted in Week 8 as part of your Module Assessment.
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
Post one key idea from the psychoanalytic theoretical orientation and one from trait theory. What is a main difference between these theoretical orientations? What is similar between these theories? Which one do you more closely align with?
Read your colleagues’ postings.
Respond to at least two of your colleague’s postings by sharing a different thought or idea about the psychoanalytic or trait theory they posted, regarding what you find interesting or about which you have questions. (Note: Your response must share a different thought or idea than those shared in the original posts by you and your colleagues).
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology
58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |