Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References Number of Pages 10 Pages Quality Level 100% Spacing Double
Graduate Level Writing Required.
DUE: Friday, January 10, 2020 by 8pm Eastern Standard Time.
Background: As a member of the local law enforcement agency you have been selected to present at a town hall meeting. The town hall meeting takes place in a community of 220,000 residents. The community has a small college, large teaching hospital, and three large public high schools. The community has requested more information on the merits of both private security and public policing.
Create: a 12- to 14-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that compares & contrasts the roles, functions, and responsibilities of public policing versus private security.
Must include EXTENSIVE speaker notes on EVERY SLIDE.
Address the following:
– Similarities between public Police and Private Security.
– Differences between public Police and Private Security.
– How leadership is different between the two areas, explain the role of both leadership positions.
– The relationship between public Policing and security w/ regards to the criminal justice system.
– Essential policies for each role in order to enhance homeland security
Include: Images, charts, and multimedia to explain the points of your presentation.
-Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
-Provide at least 4 Academic / Scholarly references.
-100% Original Work.
-Must Be Graduate Level Writing.
Criteria 0 – 1 Points 2 – 3 Point 4 – 5 Points Total Professional communication Unprofessional communication; many errors; no APA Minor grammar, spelling, and APA errors Postings are professional and in standard written English with APA Complete addressing of assessment criteria Criteria not fully addressed Minimal response to criteria; minor aspects missing All criteria are fully addressed Evidence of critical thinking or extending information Critical thinking or extending information not evident Obvious responses to questions; little thought evident Posts demonstrate critical thinking with evidence base from research or experience Course connections. No connections provided Minimal connections provided to readings/activities Clear connections to readings/activities Submitted an overview / summary of the case selected for analysis. Also identified those procedural steps to be analyzed. Did not provide an adequate overview or summary of the selected case or failed to identify those steps to be analyzed. Provides an adequate overview or summary of the selected case and steps to be analyzed though may not be clear or complete. Case overview is clearly presented including all appropriate investigative steps to be analyzed. TOTAL /25