Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

I’m working on a Biology exercise and need support.

(1) Identify an assumption that scientists are making that Lewens points out in his

article.

(2) Now, address the following:

(a) Describe what you think the implications of this assumption are.

(b) In light of the implications that you envision, state whether or not you think the

assumption is problematic. Explain why you think this assumption is/is not problematic.

NOTES: You do not need to do outside research for this discussion. ALL of the

information you need can be found in the lectures and Lewens (2018). Be creative!

Non Coding and Coding Genomic Variants Distinguish Prostate Cancer Discussion

Below are two articles to choose from for your paper. You will choose one of the two

articles, read through it, and write a review on the paper. Be sure to use concepts we

have covered in class to show your ability to integrate what you have learned. Make

sure you write the content in your own words and you do not share with others

The paper does not have to be in a typical research paper format (e.g. abstract,

introduction, etc) It should be written as a summary of the paper in your own words.

Consider the following:

Background

Purpose/Objective

Methodology

Results

Conclusion

You should incorporate concepts we have covered in class.

The paper should be a minimum of 3 pages and a maximum of 5, excluding references

and cover page.

It should be in APA format and a minimum of 3 references are required.

An example of the components required for the literature review is provided. I have also

provided a sample of an article critique. While you are not critiquing the article you are

summarizing what it is about in your own words. The format provided should be a

source. Choose one of the two articles Below:

Trabectedin Article

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30591422/ (Links to an external site.)

Kaiso Article

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002944012006050

Attached is Example/Template for Literature Review

Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

Threats of Germline Interventions Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!