Structure of Online Learning at Post University

Structure of Online Learning at Post University

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Structure of Online Learning at Post University

Post University follows an asynchronous distributed model for its online courses.  Asynchronous means that you can access your course material at anytime from any computer connected to the internet.  Distributed means that content will appear for the first week in Unit 1.  You will not see content in Units 2-8.  At the beginning of week 2, you will see Unit 1 and 2 course materials, but not the content for Units 3-8, and so on.  A Unit lasts one week.

 

Technical Support Portal

http://d2.parature.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=785 . From this link you can browse helpful guides and material and contact the support team directly – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Or chat live with a support team member, submit a ticket with your issue or concern, or call directly, toll-free: 1-866-604-5625. It is the responsibility of the student to get the technology support to be able to fully participate in the course in regard to Blackboard.

 

APA Formatting & Style Guidelines: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

APA is the standard format for any written work in the field of psychology and human services.  If you are unfamiliar with APA, it may benefit you to purchase the most current edition of the APA manual Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association or to access one of the internet sites that provides a summary of this information. The website listed above is offered as a companion to the APA style manual. However, it should not be considered a substitute for directly consulting the most current edition of the APA manual APA manual for standard of procedures for applying APA style. The Post University Learning Center (http://www.post.edu/maincampus/learningCenter.shtml) is available for consultation and proof reading of all work. Please consult them for assistance.

 

Academic Integrity: Students in this course are expected to exhibit academic integrity at all times. Be aware that plagiarism is presenting someone else’s work as your own.  Whether the act is deliberate or unintentional is irrelevant.  Please review closely the information listed on the Course Information thread of your course which outlines issues of academic integrity (and self-plagiarism) as well as University policy. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, willful or inadvertent plagiarism, cheating, unauthorized collaboration, unauthorized use of digital materials, introduction of viruses, willful interruption of systems and may also include unintentional complicity in other’s academic dishonesty. Instructors regularly monitor assignment submissions utilizing but not limited to plagiarism detection software. No papers, discussion boards, or projects submitted in a previous course will be accepted in subsequent courses. Any cases of academic dishonesty will be reported to the appropriate Academic Program Manager and other University personnel as the situation dictates. Confirmed dishonesty may result in penalties up to and including dismissal from the program of study and denial of any financial reimbursement. Students have the right to appeal decisions of academic dishonesty and should consult their Academic Success Counselor for guidance.

 

Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism occurs when a student (intentionally or unintentionally):

 

Uses someone else’s language, ideas, or other original materials without acknowledging the source.

Directly copies someone else’s language, ideas, or other original materials without using quotation marks, even if a citation is used.

Re-submits their own previously written material without acknowledging the source (self-plagiarism).  Previously submitted assignments may not be re-submitted without substantial revision.

 

Depending on circumstances surrounding the incident and after consulting with the APM /Dean involved, a review of past submissions within the course may be conducted by the instructor. Previous violations of the University Academic Dishonesty policy, if found, may impact any decision on the student’s status going forward.

Students are required to cite sources correctly according to APA style, or other University approved citation formats, in order to avoid plagiarism. Resources to assist students in proper citation formats include the University Learning Center, the Traurig Library, and tutor.com.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Structure of Online Learning at Post University

Structure of Online Learning at Post University

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!