|Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457||Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%||Writer Classification: PhD competent|
|Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago||Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours||Revision: Permitted|
|Sources: 4-6||Course Level: Masters/University College||Guarantee Status: 96-99%|
Create a thread and discuss one of the following topics. Use examples and explain your reasoning.
Start your post with a statement declaring which topic you are going to discuss.
What types of systems projects are better suited for the SDLC development strategy? Which are not?
What types of systems projects are better suited for the Agile development strategy? Which are not?
What types of systems projects are better suited for the OO development strategy? Which are not?
Clarify what constitutes a system (related to this course), systems analysis, and systems design.
Your examples can be derived from your current working environment, experience, or invented for this forum. Repeating an example that you found in an external source will not demonstrate your understanding of the topic.
You need to demonstrate that you understand the concepts you chose to discuss. If your contribution is copied and pasted, properly paraphrased, or properly quoted without any of your ideas, you will not demonstrate that you understand the concepts.
When you are graded for any work in this course, I am assessing your comprehension. In order for me to do that, you need to demonstrate that you understand.
This a required assignment worth 25 points.
Three posts are required: an initial post and two peer responses.
Do not claim credit for others’ words, ideas, or concepts, by failing to identify your sources. It is plagiarism.
Are you writing entirely off-topic? Off-topic posts degrade the quality of the forum. You will not earn points for posts not relevant to the objectives for this discussion board.
You are not required to use external sources in this class. However, if you do, use credible sources.11 Not everything on the internet is accurate; go figure!
You must cite and reference every source you paraphrase, quote, or refer to in your post, per APA 7.
Check your content for proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar before posting. If I cannot understand what you meant, you will not demonstrate an understanding.
There is no length requirement. It is not about the number of words in your post; it is the content that matters.
Formatting your post
Your citations and references need to conform to APA 7 formatting.
Cover page content? Unnecessary. Distracting.
Hanging indent? Unnecessary. Not needed.
Do not attach your posts. Write in Blackboard.
When you reply to peers
Stick to the forum topics; connect to the content your peer provided.
If you write something like, “Your post is great. Here are a few points of my own,” you have not written a peer response; that is a general post.
Do not forget to credit sources used in peer responses, per APA 7.
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
|You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
SDLC, Agile and OO development strategy
SDLC, Agile and OO development strategy