Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

I need an explanation for this Biology question to help me study.

I. An experiment for a new asthma medication was set up into two groups. Group I was

given the new drug for asthma, while Group II was given a sugar pill. The participants in

both groups recorded and reported the number of asthma attacks in a six month period.

Identify the independent variable of the experiment.

Identify the dependent variable of the experiment.

Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

Identify the experimental group of this experiment.

Identify the control group of this experiment.

What is the purpose of the sugar pill and why is it necessary for a valid experiment?

II. You observed students who arrive at least five minutes before class begins do better

on the first test than those who arrive later. You wonder if arrival time for class and

test performance are related and plan an experiment.

Write a hypothesis you could test in your experiment.

Identify the independent variable of the experiment.

Identify the dependent variable of the experiment.

Identify the experimental group of this experiment.

Identify the control group of this experiment.

Epistemology Discussion

I’m trying to study for my Biology course and I need some help to understand this

question. Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

(1) Imagine you are a philosopher who works within biology. Like Laplane et al., you

want your work to have an impact within biology. With this in mind, do the following:

(a) Select one of the fields following fields of philosophy: aesthetics, metaphysics,

or epistemology. Tell us your choice, and explain why you believe this field has an

impact on biology.

(b) Now, imagine that you are interested in applying your philosophical field of interest

to genome editing. Identify ONE example of how your philosophical field of interest

could be applied to genome editing. Briefly explain how this example relates to your

philosophical field of interest.

For this example, you cannot copy what was mentioned in the lectures. Use your

imagination and think about genome editing using the questions of these philosophical

fields that we outlined in Module 2, Lecture 1.

(2) Now, imagine that you are an epistemologist who is interested in genome editing. Do

the following:

(a) Identify whether you are an Empiricist or a Rationalist. Explain why you have chosen

this epistemological framework. Your explanation should include some of the basic

details of your chosen framework that we outlined in Module 2, Lecture 1.

NOTES: You do not need to do outside research for this discussion. ALL of the

information you need can be found in the lectures and Laplane et al. (2019). Be

creative!

Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

Science Scenarios New Asthma Medication and Test Performance

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!