Religion And Politics Doctrine Of Separation Of Church
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Religion And Politics Doctrine Of Separation Of Church
Paper details: Why do you think the doctrine of separation of church and state has little to do with maintaining legal neutrality devoid of religion in policy-making, or with diminishing religious influence on government? Note the Christian ceremonial rite in which U.S. Presidents are sworn into office on Inauguration Day by taking their oaths with their hands on two Bible, one is his own, and the other, Abraham Lincoln’s. This is explicitly Christian! If you think that the separation of church and state is a “discriminating principle” in the sense that there is no place for religion in public or political sphere because religion should be discriminated against non-religion or atheism or agnosticism or skepticism, then this cannot happen. Look at another example. In France, the use of hijab, a Muslim woman’s head-cover, is legally prohibited in public school while hijab is allowed in public school in the U.S. The primary reason for the French law is allegedly security because the police cannot identify how the person is. But it is clear that the French people and government, in general, think that the Islamic religious custom is destroying their ethnic culture and belief which is predominantly secular atheism or agnosticism or skepticism. When asked, many French people believe that the separation of church and state can be a relevant ideal, which means that they believe that the principle can be a discriminating ideal, discriminating any particular religions including Christianity against the secular French beliefs. Confining to the U.S. context, the phrase, the “separation of church and state” does not exist in our Constitutions. However, we believe that the principle is a summary of the First Amendment, which guarantees an individual’s freedom of religion. Thus, it is not a discriminatory but an embracing principle. Accordingly, all religions should be respected equally. Therefore, any one particular religion cannot be favored over or discriminated against the other in the public or political setting. If so, there are two problems. First, how can we respect all religions when different religions sometimes demand contradictory policies? Second, what is the place of atheism or agnosticism or skepticism? If these are not religions, they cannot be protected under the First Amendment. How do you answer the two problems? Limit the essay in 400 words but no less than 300 words. Attached is some to linlryks to help with the essay. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/yes-there-is-a-constituti_b_8171550 https://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/07/09/the-true-meaning-of-separation-of-church-and-state/?sh=693b3d6b5d02 https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/07/05/10-facts-about-religion-and-government-in-the-united-states/
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Religion And Politics Doctrine Of Separation Of Church
Religion And Politics Doctrine Of Separation Of Church