Reflective Essay On Management Information Systems

July 10, 2021

Reflective Essay on Management Information Systems

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Essay about Reflection
Prior to the start of this session, students must prepare a reflective essay about their perceptions, attitudes, knowledge, and experiences with information systems. The essay must be typed, double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, and in 12 point Times New Roman font. This essay should be written as a first-person narrative. Personal and educational experiences, as well as information relevant to the student’s career ambitions, should be included in this essay.

The following questions will serve as a guide, but they are not exhaustive:

Why are you taking this course (don’t just say “it’s required”)?

What events (classes, people, books, employment, etc.) influenced your decision?

What do you hope to gain from this course, and why do you want to learn it?

What implications does this topic/class have for the student’s personal or professional goals?

Describe your current knowledge of information systems.

What issues do you think you’ll face in the modern corporate world, and how do you think you’ll cope with them (in MIS)?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met