Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

SQUIRE Discussion
DNP 830 Week 2 Discussion 1
The Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines
provide some guidance on the evaluation of quality improvement efforts.

They are used
as both grant proposal and manuscript preparation guides. Use the "Revised Standards
for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: SQUIRE 2.0" resource to respond to the
following:
Discuss how your project/prospectus fits into the SQUIRE guidelines.

Explain why your
project is a quality improvement project and not a research project.
DNP 830 Week 2 Discussion 2
Discuss why quantitative method is the best method based on your project questions
and data. Choose three potential designs that you could use for your project. Based on
the three potential designs, determine potential analyses methods and why?
Main Characteristics of the Phylum Actinobacteria PPT
The second part of the assignment (Microbial Diversity, Video): prepare and record 5
min video that should introduce your microbe and highlight the microbe main
characteristics.

To record video, you can use any tool you like, but here are some
options. You can use the Canvas studio or Zoom to record your presentation.

You can
also use any online tool you want to create video clips ( See examples!)
Your video should summarize the information you learn (15 pt).  Like with summary, you
should review your peer's work (slides/videos), provide constructive feedback, and
answer their questions (5pt).
We will select 10 videos to share with the class. Selected videos will receive a bonus 10
pt.
TIMELINE for ONLINE PART II:
MARCH 24 – MARCH 31: Collect materials, write summary, prepare slide, write
narrations for your video
APR 1: Submit SLIDES for peer review
APR 1-APR 7: Record your videos. Review your peer's slides, provide your feedback
and comment.
APR 8: Submit VIDEOS for peer review. Watch your peer's videos provide comments.

Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) Guidelines

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!