PSYC 380 The Research Review Paper

PSYC 380 The Research Review Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

PSYC 380 The Research Review Paper

Research Paper: Final Paper Assignment Instructions

Overview

This Research Paper: Final Paper Assignment is the second and final installment of our Research Paper Assignment series. Using the topic you developed through research earlier in the term you now have an opportunity to synthesize and present the information found in your approved list of articles. In doing so you will realize the value of effective examination of scholarly articles. You will also begin to develop a greater understanding of the value and importance of your topic in the field of Biological Psychology. Finally, you will have an opportunity to briefly examine your topic in light of a biblical worldview perspective. The process we have followed in this series is one you are likely to find useful in future classes.

Instructions

For this Research Paper: Final Paper Assignment, you will:

1. Include the following main sections (level 1 headings) and sub-sections (level 2 headings):
2. Introduction: describe your topic and explain its importance. End the introduction with the purpose statement for your paper.
3. Literature Review

The Research Review is based on the 8 (or more) articles identified earlier in the term. As a reminder, this was the selection criteria:

The articles must be selected from the JF Library. All 8 must be from peer-reviewed journals published within the past 5 years. At least 6 of the 8 should describe original research. Each article must support your research question and purpose statement.

• Describe the first point of your review (remember that each article cited must provide information to directly support your purpose statement).
• Briefly describe the research findings as they relate to your topic.
• Explain the significance of the research in relation to your topic.
• Describe strengths and weaknesses (in the methodology)
• Explain how this research connects to your purpose statement/topic.
• Describe the second point of your review (remember that each article cited must provide information to directly support your purpose statement).
• Briefly describe the research findings as they relate to your topic.
• Explain the significance of the research in relation to your topic.
• Describe strengths and weaknesses (in the methodology)
• Explain how this research connects to your purpose statement/topic.
• Describe the third point of your review (remember that each article cited must provide information to directly support your purpose statement).
• Briefly describe the research findings as they relate to your topic.
• Explain the significance of the research in relation to your topic.
• Describe strengths and weaknesses (in the methodology)
• Explain how this research connects to your purpose statement/topic.

<REPEAT FOR AS MANY SECTIONS AS ARE NEEDED TO ADDRESS YOUR TOPIC>

1. Biblical Worldview Integration: What does scripture say about your topic? Please provide depth/detail here. This section should include approximately 250-500 words.
2. Conclusion: Bring the various concepts together as you describe the discoveries you have made, identify strengths and weaknesses, and indicate possible directions for future research.
3. Apply current APA formatting guidelines within the following structure:
4. Title page (apply APA student standards)
5. Body/Text

• organize by using level-one headings to introduce each section
• This part of the paper should include a total of 8-10 pages. It includes the introduction, literature review, Biblical worldview integration, and conclusion but does not include the title page or references.

1. References Page (must include all sources cited in your paper).

• Textbook
• Articles (at least 8 articles; see the criteria listed above).
• Scripture

3. Adhere to these guidelines related to mechanics/structure:
4. All lines of the paper must be evenly double-spaced.
5. Use 1” margins on all sides.
6. Avoid the use of a first-person perspective (I, me, my, we)
7. Do not include direct quotes (except for brief quotations from Scripture). Instead, re-write in your own words to demonstrate your understanding of the information. Of course, a citation is needed to identify your source even if you have paraphrased the content.
8. Include an appropriate citation to identify your source(s) whenever you include information that is not considered common knowledge.
9. Check your work carefully to eliminate spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
10. Ensure a logical and clear flow by including appropriate transitions between sections.
11. Note that your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Page 2 of 2

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow PSYC 380 The Research Review Paper

PSYC 380 The Research Review Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!