- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment Solution
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. All responses to lab questions should be in your own words or paraphrased.
Encoding Specificity Lab
Data
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
- Insert your data in the table below.
Study/Test Cue* Proportion Correct [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] *Strong and Weak refer to the extent to which cue and target are related in meaning. Weak/Weak and Strong/Strong designate conditions where the cues, used at study and test, were the same. Weak/Strong and Strong/Weak designate conditions where the cues, used at study and test, were different.
- Insert a screenshot of the lab output below.
[Insert screenshot]
Lab Questions
- Do your results support the encoding specificity hypothesis? Why or why not? Note: Consider what led to the best results—having strong semantic associations between cue and target, or matching cues at encoding and test?
[Insert text]
- Describe a real or hypothetical example of a situation that demonstrates encoding specificity. Ensure that your example is original and not from course materials.
[Insert text]
Levels of Processing Lab
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
Data
- Insert your data in the table below.
Condition/Task Proportion Correct [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value]
- Insert a screenshot of the lab output below.
[Insert screenshot]
Lab Questions
- Do your results support the levels of processing theory? Why or why not? Focus on how well you did in the test condition (relative to how you encoded) to answer this question.
[Insert text]
- What is meant by deep processing? How might you use this to improve memory in a real-world scenario? Describe a unique example. Be creative!
[Insert text]
False Memory Lab
Data
- Insert your data in the table below.
Type of Item Percent Recognized [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value] [Insert text] [Insert value]
- Insert a screenshot of the lab output below.
[Insert screenshot]
Lab Questions
- Did your results conform to those predicted for this lab? Why or why not?
[Insert text]
- How did this study set participants up to experience false memory? Deese, Roediger, and McDermott also found people can be confident in their selection of the false memory item. Why do you think that is? Your answer will be graded based on the depth of your thinking.
[Insert text]
Module Question
- Compare and contrast levels of processing with encoding specificity. Describe a difference and a similarity.
[Insert text]
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
PSY 375 Module Four Lab Worksheet Template Assignment
