Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
Prince George’s Community College Summer 2021
CHM 1010 NAME_____________________________
BOYLE ASSIGNED: June 21, 2021 DUE DATE: July 19, 2021
PROJECT 1 – PROPERTIES OF AN ELEMENT
You will write a report on the element assigned to you in this email. For this element, you will provide the information listed and additional information as specified below. You will submit a Microsoft Word file of your project – on the Word file, the hyperlinks must be hot! (they must work!!) You will submit the softcopy to your course Blackboard site, using SafeAssign to check for plagiarism. You will be allowed a maximum of 3 submissions; your last submission will be graded.
The project must contain in the order listed:
1) A cover sheet with the element name or formula and your name (Date, College name, course, Professors name, etc.)
2) All the data listed in the table on the below page, with the data in the table with proper units. This table should be typed. You may use any sources you wish (books, periodicals, Internet sites) to collect the data but these sources must be properly cited and the references available in a bibliography (see #4). On the Word file, the links (hyperlinks) to your references must be hot! (they must work!!)
3) Neatly typed narrative description (1,000 words minimum, i.e., about two pages minimum) of the uses, importance, biological significance (if any) historical information, and any additional interesting information for the element. This should be written in paragraph format with proper grammar and spelling. Outlines or lists will not be given credit. Information must be properly cited (see #4). Plagiarism will result in a zero grade for this project with no chance to earn the lost points through other means.
4) List of references or a bibliography, properly cited (minimum of 6 references).
For your in-text citations, use the Chicago System (Author, year, page) see:
http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html
(Click on the Go to Author-Date tab!)
For the list of references or bibliography, also use the Chicago System; see
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/chicago_manual_17th_edition/cmos_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.html
Your in-text citation to a printed source should hyperlink to the reference in your bibliography. Your in-text citation to an online source should also hyperlink to the reference in your bibliography. However, the hyperlinks from each of your references should be to the specific webpage(s) where you obtained the information.
5) The points for your project will be as follows:
5 – Table data
5 – Table citations, references
5 – Text, proper citations
5 – Bibliography or list of references, correct format
5 – Softcopy, hyperlinks
25 – Cover page, narrative text (neatness, originality, avoidance of plagiarism, etc.)
50 – Total points
No project will be accepted late.
Element __________________________________
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
PROJECT 1 PROPERTIES OF AN ELEMENT |