Personality Tests and Analysis Essay Assignment
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Personality Tests and Analysis Essay Assignment
Learning Objectives 3d and 4a
For this written assignment, you will explore your own personality by taking two *free* personality tests.
Overview of the Five-Factor Model of Personality, also called the “Big Five”
The Five-Factor Model of Personality is a trait approach to personality. Watch the following Ted Talk to learn more about the five areas below, before proceeding to step one:
https://www.ted.com/talks/brian_little_who_are_you_really_the_puzzle_of_personality.
- Opennessto experience/intellect: Are you eager to try new experiences and ideas, or are you more comfortable having experiences stay the same most of the time?
- Conscientiousness: How organized of a person are you? Are you a reliable person, or are you generally careless with your actions?
- Extraversion:Are you a social person who feels “recharged” when interacting with other people, or are you a quiet, more reserved person who prefers solitude?
- Agreeableness:Would you say you are a compassionate, forgiving, and understanding person, or do you tend to be more critical and blunt to people?
- Neuroticism:Are you someone who is nervous, anxious, and worries about the future, or are you calm and hard to fluster?
Step 1: Take the “Big Five” at the following link: http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/.
Write a thoughtful one or two paragraph essay that addresses the following:
- Briefly summarize your personality test results. Do not copy/paste the results from the personality test; instead, summarize your results in your own words.
- Explain the ways in which you agree or disagree with the results. Next, think of someone that knows you well. Explain the ways in which he or she would agree or disagree with your results.
- Based on your results, identify one area you might like to improve. Explain specific strategies you might use to implement the improvement.
Overview of the Holland Code
In the corporate world, research is done to pinpoint certain trait profiles that will result in a successful employee and help people in selecting careers. One assessment used to evaluate career decisions and occupational fit is the Holland Code. Completing the inventory provides you a three letter code with your dominant personality traits out of six categories:
- Investigative (Ideas):People who like to observe, learn, investigate, analyze, evaluate, or solve problems primarily of a scientific or mathematical nature. They prefer working with ideas instead of people, and they do not like highly structured settings.
- Artistic (Creativity): People who have artistic, innovating, or intuitional abilities, and like to work in unstructured situations, using their creativity or imagination. They prefer working with self-expressive ideas.
- Social (People): People who like to work with people – to inform, enlighten, help, train, cure them, or help them live up to their potential. They prefer solving problems through discussion and usually do not prefer to work with things.
- Enterprising (Tasks): People who like to work with people – influencing, persuading, leading, or managing them for economic gain or for goals of an organization. They enjoy leadership positions and dislike details.
- Conventional (Order): People who like to work with data, have numerical or clerical ability, carrying things out in detail, or following through on other’s instructions. They prefer structured situations over ambiguous ones.
- Realistic (Things): People who have athletic or mechanical ability, prefer to work with objects, machines, tools, plants or animals, or to be outdoors. They prefer working with things as opposed to ideas or people and prefer concrete problems over abstract problems.
Step 2: Take the Holland Code provided through SPC’s Career Coach program: https://spcollege.emsicc.com/. If you have not worked in this system previously, you will need to create a profile. To set up a profile, use the following steps:
- Click “Sign Up” in the upper right-hand corner
- Use your school email address to create this profile.
- Complete your registration and click “Create Profile.”
- Once you have created your profile, in the Welcome! box (on the right of your profile information), click “Take Career Assessment.”
- Select the Detailed Assessment – 60 questions
**If you already have an account, please login and click “Take Career Assessment.” Select the Detailed Assessment – 60 questions.**
Answer the questions based on your interests without considering the amount of money you would make performing the task and the level of education/training necessary.
Once you have completed the assessment, you will receive your Holland Code with detailed descriptions and your top career matches based on your results.
Write a thoughtful one or two paragraph essay that addresses the following:
- Briefly summarize your results. Do not copy/paste the results from the Holland Code inventory; instead, summarize your results in your own words. Explain the ways in which you agree or disagree with the results.
- Select one career match that you are interested in and explain why you would be a good fit for this career based on your results. How does this career relate to your selected degree program?
Step 3: Review the grading rubric (webpage, opens in new tab), which explains the expectations for your writing assignment.
Step 4: Put your essays from the “Big Five” inventory and the Holland Code inventory into one Word document. If you do not use Word, please save your document as a PDF or RTF file. Submit your document to the drop box.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Personality Tests and Analysis Essay Assignment
Personality Tests and Analysis Essay Assignment