Personal Integrity Management Skills Paper solution

Personal Integrity Management Skills Paper

Table of Contents

Toggle

Instructions

Personal Integrity Management Skills Paper

Description

PHL-282: Ethics

Getting Started

Personal Integrity Management Skills

Let us take a minute to see what we have accomplished so far in developing our Personal Intentional Integrity Plans, and to put the next set of activities in context. Thus far, in compiling your PIIP, you have:

• Taken stock of your Wheel of Life to see how well balanced it is.
• Worked on creating a stable hub for your life by preparing a Life Purpose Statement, a Life Vision Statement, and a Life Values Statement.
• Set some specific growth goals in at least two areas: Spiritual Growth Goals and Career Enhancement Goals.

In doing this, you have considered several spiritual principles of integrity that McAdam suggests.

Now it is time to turn your attention to what McAdam calls “Personal Integrity Management Skills” (PIMS).

• File: Intentional integrity.PDF: Aligning your life with God’s values
• Text: Moral choices: An introduction to ethics

 

Background Information

Many of us have a strong utilitarian streak in us. Utilitarianism seems to be part of the American way, even though we are not philosophically very sophisticated about this ethical position.

Instructions

1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
2. Read pages 72-77 of Moral Choices.
3. Respond to the following questions in the discussion forum:
   1. Do you believe that actions can be judged right or wrong solely on the basis of their consequences? Explain your thinking.
   2. Utilitarians place ultimate value on happiness. How do you evaluate their priorities? Do you believe other things besides happiness have intrinsic value? If so, how might your different priorities affect your application of utilitarianism?
   3. Utilitarians place little if any significance on the motives behind people’s acts. Where do you feel “motives” enter the picture in distinguishing right from wrong?
4. Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
5. Read and respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts, as well as all instructor follow-up questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
6. Your postings should also:
   1. Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
   2. Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
   3. Provide clarification to classmates’ questions and insight into the discussion.
7. You can also access the discussion forum by using the Activities button.

Personal Integrity Management Skills Paper

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!