Navigating Employment Realms: Comparative Analysis of Rights and Regulations
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
Navigating Employment Realms: Comparative Analysis of Rights and Regulations
Unit VII Scholarly Activity – Instructions
For this assignment you will write a two-part scholarly paper. It requires you to use academic sources, scholarly word choice and tone, and effective use of evidence.
Begin with an introduction that establishes an understanding of the purpose of your paper. Clearly present your thesis and a summary of the main points.
Next, for the first part, you must compare and contrast the rights—and the regulation of those rights—of unionized employees versus public sector employees. Address the following, at a minimum:
Differentiate the governance of rights for unionized and public sector employees.
Examine the rights of unionized employees versus public sector employees.
Next, you will compare and contrast the rights and benefits of a non-union member versus a union member in a unionized bargaining unit. Be sure to:
Summarize the rights of both members in a bargaining environment.
Examine the differences for the two member classes when it comes to strikes, concerted action, and other organization efforts.
Explain employer conduct that violates employees’ rights.
Your paper must be a minimum of three pages, not including the title or reference pages. You may include up to three graphics (not decorative images or pictures), tables, or charts to augment your paper.
You must use a minimum of three academic or peer-reviewed sources to support your paper. One source must come from the CSU Online Library.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow