Immobile Politics of Lockdown Discussion

Immobile Politics of Lockdown Discussion

Instructions

Mobile Pathways of Pathogens & Immobile Politics of Lockdown Discussion

should include a detailed discussion of at least 2 authors, key points, main argument/provocations and contributions. You must include at least 1 question you have about the reading as well. There are multiple creative ways to talk across authors and ideas and I encourage you to think deeply about how you put them in conversation with one another. I encourage you to take advantage of the multimedia affordances of the online platform by including images, videos memes etc. in your posts.

topic:

Immobility and the World of Friction

Disease: The Mobile Pathways of Pathogens and the Immobile Politics of Lockdown

Reading:

Davis, Mike (2020). “In a Plague Year.” Jacobin.

Immobile Politics of Lockdown Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!