Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

Instructions
Please just explain purposes of stains, staining procedure, results and how the stains
work –
Gram Stain: Compare S.aureus vs. E.coli.
Acid-Fast Stain: Compare M.smegmatis vs. E.coli.
Endospore Stain: Compare B. subtilis vs. S. aureus
Negative (Capsule) Stain: Compare S.aureus vs. S. lactis
Bay Near the City Discussion
Get outside, whether you are near the beach, mountains, desert, or river, you can
observe and discuss geological and ecological features as follows;
Choose a site to observe.
Describe the geological makeup of the site (be detailed, not just sand but describe all
the features and makeup of the sand).
Analyze the feature to suggest what factors affected the feature (such as erosion) and
caused it to change over time.
Take a picture of your observed site and submit with your description and analysis.

Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

Microbiology Stains Lab Report Discussion Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!