Materials and Methods Results Part Project

Materials and Methods Results Part Project

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Materials and Methods Results Part Project

Materials and Methods:  This section should be divided into sub-sections with sub-headings and written in paragraph form using concise sentences. It is a concise, but detailed, narrative of the procedures you performed in lab and materials/sources of materials. Do not include unnecessary detail but be thorough enough so that someone else could understand and repeat the procedure. For example, provide reagents used, concentrations, incubation times and other specific conditions that apply.  For steps, you performed using online resources, be sure to include mention of any data analysis programs/tools utilized.

You should include any modifications or deviations from the standard protocols provided. Look at example primary research article for examples of methods & materials style paper writing. The protocol materials utilized (e.g. lab manual) should be cited and this section must be written in your own words –not copied directly from other sources! For this section only, you may choose to include a brief statement at the start of the materials &methods section to note that the following procedures were adapted from the CMMB lab manual (CMMB, year) instead of Cell Bio Lab providing in-text citations throughout the materials &methods sections. Online lab-specific guidelines: Only steps performed yourself are written out in detail. Refer readers to the source (lab manual)for procedures performed elsewhere to provide a brief description of experimental procedures performed and samples generated for you in the lab.

For example, The construction of the DHFR expression vector and bacterial transformation of BL21 (DE3) cells were performed as described previously (CMMB, 2020).

Results: Results reflect what was actually done in the lab and should be presented clearly and concisely incomplete paragraphs. In the text, call attention to the important parts of the data and relevant tables or figures.

Avoid in-depth discussion of the meaning or interpretation your results in this section but be sure to clearly state all results**, results from each analysis, experimental and control conditions.

Data should be presented in properly labeled and organized tables and figures where appropriate. These should be labeled, both numerically and with titles. Data figures and tables should have legends containing sufficient information so that they can stand alone. Be sure to number tables and figures consecutively and refer to them in the text of this section. If you use a figure/table you must describe it somewhere in the text.**Results to include: Purified protein quantification (including standard curve); SDS-PAGE analysis, Western Blot analysis; Computational analysis (including molecular weight calculation and protein tag location)Online lab specific guidelines: You will be provided with any data to include in your report that was collected for you in the lab and will include all data you collected through your own computational analysis.

Materials & Methods/Results Part I Draft: Include Title page, draft of the Materials &Methods and Results sections covered thus far, through protein quantification, and a Reference section. You will not have all of the information that you will ultimately include in your M&M and Results section, so realize that you will build from this draft in response to feedback and add additional sub-sections as you go. The Reference section included here should have the Lab Manual referenced in your materials and methods section and any other sources used to write sections of this draft

Formatting:  Written report components must be typed, double-spaced,& in 11 or 12 points font as a word doc. Please spell-check and proofread your work as writing and mechanics assessed in the grading for all drafts. Use headings for each section. Formal writing should not mirror casual conversation. Use the past tense to describe experiments that were done.         

Materials and Methods Results Part Project

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Materials and Methods Results Part Project

Materials and Methods Results Part Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!