Lynn Media and National Culture Essay

Lynn Media and National Culture Essay

Instructions

Lynn Media and National Culture Essay
This week we began our inquiry into the complex relation between cinema and the nation-state. We read three texts written by Susan Hayward, Geert Hofstede, and David Kosalka, and viewed the film “Downfall” (Germany, 2005). The text by Hayward and provides us with an introductory discussion to the scholarly study of “national cinema.” In this discussion the relation between cinema and the nation is negotiated with several critical axes of inquiry in mind: extra-territorial considerations relating to the films’ conditions of production, i.e. funding, shooting locations, language, production cast and crew, etc.; relational considerations, i.e. the study of national cinema in relation to other cinemas, particularly Hollywood cinema; and nation-building/essentialist considerations which place their focus on the cinematic text itself, its style, themes, narrative, political sensibility, etc. (see Hayward’s seven typologies) . Hayward also discusses national cinema as a state institution that can be studied via the films themselves, critical writing about the films, and the archiving institutions charged with their preservation (cultural artifacts).
Geert Hofstede introduces the study of culture as a mental programing of the mind. Kosalka further develops this notion a consideration of national culture, the ideological backbone of the modern Nation-State. Historians, Kosalka argues, were the architects of the national narratives that fueled the construction of the nation-state through the use of a myriad of cultural artifacts — the agents that propagated and disseminated these ideas on a mass scale. Once more, the media is seen a a conduit that mobilizes ideas that make up the world that we inhabit.
In your reaction to this intriguing discussion try to integrate arguments that are made in each of the three texts while utilizing the film “Downfall” as your case study. At the end of your reaction paper provide your personal input on what you thought about the material read and the film.
Be aware that the paper should not exceed 600 words (not including title page and references). This means that you should seek to develop a discussion with a clear focus on the issues that you would like to address, and do so, with a clear voice that articulates your position. The review should be concise and should integrate direct quotations from the text (no longer than one or two sentence quotes with formatted citations). Be sure to provide your perspective in relation to the area of the debate that you chose to address. On the title page, give your work an original title that can represent the focus of your work.
Follow APA/MLA/Chicago formats for citations throughout!!! DO NOT FORGET THE WORKS CITED PAGE.
Review your work for spelling and grammatical accuracy.
Discussion Questions I: Media National Culture
Discussion Questions I: Media National CultureUnlimited Attempts Allowed
You should prepare 2-3 discussion questions relating to each of the assigned readings for the week.
The questions should introduce the issue to which they are referring and present a critical question in response to the issue at hand.
The assignment is designed to assess your fluency and understanding of the material rather than your effort to understand the reading.

Lynn Media and National Culture Essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!