Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

Your EMGA Report will compile your hypotheses, finalized methods, data, analysis of

the data, comparison of your data to your predictions, and your conclusions.

Background/Justification: You will likely use this section from your proposal as a first

draft for this section. This section, less than one page, double-spaced, should provide

background for your hypothesis. A top-scoring background will explain the context of the

experiment, and why this experiment is useful. It will be logical, organized into topically-

organized paragraphs, and have perfect grammar and spelling.

Hypothesis or question(s): This section should clearly state what hypothesis(es) you will

test or what question(s) you investigated. A top-scoring hypothesis or question will be

logical and clear, and pose an interesting idea, as well as have perfect grammar and

spelling.

Methods: This section (up to two pages, double-spaced) should describe what methods

you used, and how you analyzed your data. A top-scoring methods section will describe

how the methods tested the hypothesis/answered the question, and convince the reader

that that the methods were well-controlled (protected from artifacts/other explanations

for pattern). It will also be well-organized, with a clear structure, and perfect grammar

and spelling.

 Science Communication and Biology Discussion

In at least 100 words, describe how you think that science communication intersects

with biology. You can make this as broad or specific as you would like! Comment on the

responses of at least two of your peers

1: Science communication and biology do indeed share a correlation considering that

both are applicable in each other's field of study. I feel that science communication is

the idea of sharing or spreading the knowledge of topics that are science related.

Biology is the study of life and is considered a life science which I can say with

confidence uses science communication. We are all ca[able of spreading knowledge to

our peers and it us up to them to retain the information for their sake or interest.

Publishing a paper on a topic that is newly discovered or highly debated is a form of

communication. It allows readers to learn the information and analyze it themselves to

formulate their own premises.

2: Biology and science communication intersect in many areas. Science communication

with the public is important, even more so with biology. Biologists make great efforts to

communicate with the public and keep them informed. This helps the public to continue

supporting the biologists and to keep faith in Biology. Would Biology even be here

without science communication with the general public? I certainly doubt it. People fear

what they do not understand, and they would certainly not fund any endeavors they

fear. Biology would be nowhere near as advanced or influential without science

communication. This is the most general but arguably the most important area of

intersection between the two. Thank you for reading

Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

Lifting Objects of Different Weights Report

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!