Leading Global High-performance teams

Leading Global High-performance teams

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Leading Global High-performance teams

Paper details: Put yourself in the position of an instructor. Develop a presentation that teaches the audience about high-performance teams and leading a global team. Answer the following questions: How do a leader’s ethics affect the relationship with followers? How are high-performance teams developed? How does a high-performance team establish a strategy, goals, and tasks? What are the traits, characteristics, and dynamics of a high-performance team? How does communication with a global team affect team dynamics? Use correct punctuation and grammar throughout your presentation.

A good rule of thumb for presentations is less is more. Paragraphs on slides is not good practice? consider using 10 words or less on your slides. . Be creative and share a story. Your presentation should include content to cover all questions and topics listed above. As a guide, the expectation for a traditional presentation in PowerPoint would include information in the speaker notes section with a minimum of eight slides. You must use at least two outside sources. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Be sure to use APA Stylryle for citations and references.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Leading Global High-performance teams

Leading Global High-performance teams

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!