LDC Cloud Systems Case Study Essay

LDC Cloud Systems Case Study Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

LDC Cloud Systems Case Study Essay

Paper details: The final deliverable for the Course Project is a narrated presentation reflecting on: I. Key Insights in each of these areas: The Fraud Triangle – What examples from the case study support: a) Pressure(s) to commit unethical actions or fraudulent activities? b) Opportunities due to weak internal controls or rewards for bad behavior? c) Rationalization(s) by employees and key players that minimized the consequences of bad behavior? The Organizational Structure of LDC a) How did you evaluate the key players’ performance? b) How does the reporting relationships in the organization hinder fraud investigation? The Internal Control Environment and Ethical Culture a) Identify weaknesses in the internal control systems. b) What evidence exists that “doing the right thing” is expected (or not) by employees? II. Recommendations to prevent, detect and investigate fraud in these areas: PASTURE #1: OUTLINE OF THE CASE (“WHAT IS GOING ON AT LDC?”) Objective: The objective is to talk about LDC and identify the specific problems that exist there. PASTURE #2: REFLECTION ON WHAT WENT WRONG (“HOW DID WE GET HERE?”) Objective: The objective is to identify the underlying factors that existed at LDC and that likely caused or contributed to the problems identified above. PASTURE #3: THE FINANCIAL REPORTING SUPPLY CHAIN Objective: To evaluate each member of the financial reporting supply chain. Students will assess the overall performance of the key players in the case study. PASTURE #4. THE FINANCIAL REPORTING ENVIRONMENT (“HOW DOES THE SYSTEM WORK, AND HOW SHOULD IT WORK?”) Objective: To explore the internal controls systems, the roles and responsibilities of the various key players particularly their inter dependencies and the ethical culture in the company “This course examines the nature of occupational fraud, how it is committed, and introduces actions to detect it and procedures to deter it. The course also covers how to investigate allegations of fraud in order to meet requirements of civil and/or criminal court procedures. Also examined are ethics and governance in business as fraud-prevention tools. Coursework prepares students interested in earning the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential, examining tools and techniques for gathering evidenlryce and information during fraud examinations”

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow LDC Cloud Systems Case Study Essay

LDC Cloud Systems Case Study Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!