Journalism in the Age of Social Media Discussion

Journalism in the Age of Social Media Discussion

Instructions

Journalism in the Age of Social Media Discussion

DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLE REVIEW

Students will select one scholarly research article from the three provided below. Analyse their selected article by responding to the areas identified below that speak to evaluating the connection between the theoretical framework presented by the authors and the methodological approach they took. To do this students will need to identify the conceptual construct and theoretical framework directing the research, methods used, study limitations, and other theoretical and ethical issues of the research project the article describes.

(Focus Group)

McCollough, K., Crowell, J. K., & Napoli, P. M. (2017). Portrait of the Online Local News Audience. Digital Journalism, 5(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1152160

 

THE BASICS

This is an individual assignment and NOT a group project and should be worked on accordingly.

Please provide your Name, ID number, campus, and Unit code and the citation of the article under analysis at the beginning of your essay that will be submitted on CLOUD.

The topics on Surveys, Focus Groups and Content analysis and the Topic 5 discussion on how to evaluate original research in the Study Guide will help you with this assignment. The specific module relevant to your essay will largely depend on the article selected.

Specific instructions for Essay

• Select for analysis ONE scholarly research article from the 3 options provided above.
• The article you select is an example of original research using one of the three methods we have studied so far. In your analysis of the study you will need to:
  • Identify and critique the rationale of the study;
  • Identify and critique the research question(s) or hypothesis;
    • Assess whether the question set or hypothesis testing approach draws on a theoretical framework.
    • Identify the conceptual construct directing the research questions.
    • Describe the definitions presented in the literature review that define the scope and application of the questions or hypothesis.
    • Critique whether the conceptual construct and its associated definitions clarifies, focuses or limits the scope of the study.
  • Describe and critique the research methodology;
    • Identify whether the methodology is qualitative, quantitative or mixed method in approach and justify your analysis of this with external source references.
    • Describe and critique the choice of research population or data universe
    • Identify and critique the data collection method and sampling approach
    • Identity the analytical components of the method, define what they are and how they are used.
    • Critique whether the authors have applied the data collection and analytical techniques appropriately.
    • Identify and critique the study limitations
    • Identify and critique how the researchers addressed the ethical considerations raised by the methodology.
  • Analyse the study findings; and
    • Critique whether these are logically connected to the research question and data collection approach.
    • Consider whether the sampling approach taken will support further generalisation of the study findings
  • Present an assessment of the heuristic value of the study.
    • Consider the contribution of the study to gap in existing knowledge
    • Consider whether the study respond to and either resolve or further expand insight into an existing social problem?
    • Consider whether the study raises concerns or new insights for further investigation.

1. • Consider if this study responds to a gap in the research, builds upon existing research, applies a new technique or responds to a social problem.

Your analysis will need to discuss the above areas in an essay approach and draw on the textbook, unit materials and additional scholarly resources provided in the unit reading list or through your own research.

Use the Harvard system of referencing, providing the sources of your information wherever relevant. The reference list at the end of the essay should include all sources cited within the body of the essay.

You are likely to draw on between 6-8 scholarly references to support your analysis, including the textbook, unit materials and wider research literature related to the original study.

SSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ESSAY

Introduction: Identification and critique of the rationale of study – introduce selected study and identify and critique the rationale for the study

Examination of research question – identify and examine the research question(s) or hypothesis, including the application of theoretical constructs

Review and application of research literature – critically analyse and apply selected national and international literature to the analysis of the theoretical basis and empirical evidence of the study

Interrogation of research methods: identify and examine the research methods employed taking into consideration qualitative/quantative approaches; variables measured; targeted population or universe; collection and sampling; analytical components; and use of external sources.

Ethical considerations: examine the ethical considerations of the study and any other limitations

Critical analysis and evaluation of findings: assess the strengths and limitations of all components of the study, but especially the degree to which the findings are supported by the evidence and methodology.

Structure, composition, expression and referencing: present a well–structured paper in which arguments and findings are composed in a coherent and logical manner and are expressed in clear and research-appropriate language in accordance with scholarly citation and referencing standards.

Journalism in the Age of Social Media Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!