Jesuit Values to Power and Love
Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Jesuit Values to Power and Love
Is it possible for a person to embrace the Jesuit values while using power and political behaviors? Choose one or two of the Jesuit values and discuss how power and political behaviors can or cannot be applied to these values. Be specific about what type of power and which political behavior you are discussing.
Does caffeine enhance performance on athletics or exams? What about nicotine? Are these drugs banned in any situations? Is that fair?
Often athletes argue that the banned substances they take have not been scientifically proven to have an effect on performance. Do you think athletes should be allowed to take these drugs? Why or why not?
We are learning about the muscular system in this Unit of class. Some drugs definitely affect muscle – how do they do this? Other drugs enhance performance in other ways – how do they do it?
Should athletes be stripped of their titles, awards, or sponsors, if they are caught doping? Do the circumstances matter? Why or why not?
How has this class helped you better understand the anatomy or physiology of the human body, and the effect of performance enhancing drugs?
Jesuit Values to Power and Love
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow