Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
International trade and political inequality
International trade has the potential to generate economic growth, create jobs, and raise living standards in participating countries. However, it also has the potential to exacerbate political inequality, particularly when one country or group of countries dominates the trade relationship.
At the heart of the issue is the concept of relative power. In any international trade relationship, each country brings its own set of resources and capabilities to the table. Some countries have natural resources, while others have strong manufacturing sectors or highly skilled workforces. In theory, trade allows countries to specialize in the things they do well and exchange their surplus goods or services for the things they need from other countries.
However, the reality is often more complicated. Countries that are rich in resources or have strong economies are often able to negotiate better trade deals, which can further reinforce their dominance in the global marketplace. For example, if a wealthy country negotiates a trade agreement with a poorer country that is heavily dependent on a single export, such as oil or minerals, the richer country may be able to dictate the terms of the deal to its advantage. This can result in a situation where the richer country receives a steady supply of cheap resources or goods, while the poorer country remains stuck in a cycle of dependence and underdevelopment.
In addition to economic power imbalances, there are also political power imbalances that can arise from international trade. Countries that are economically dominant often have greater political influence in international organizations and negotiations. They may also use their economic clout to pressure other countries to adopt policies or practices that are in their own best interests, rather than in the interests of the wider global community.
For example, some countries may use trade agreements as a way to impose their own environmental or labor standards on other countries. While this may be intended to promote higher standards across the board, it can also be seen as a way for the dominant country to level the playing field to their advantage. Similarly, dominant countries may use their influence to shape the rules and regulations governing international trade in ways that benefit their own industries, such as by lobbying for lower tariffs or fewer trade barriers.
One of the key challenges in addressing these power imbalances is that international trade is often governed by a patchwork of bilateral and multilateral agreements, each with its own set of rules and regulations. This can make it difficult for countries to coordinate their policies and negotiate fair trade deals. In addition, many developing countries lack the resources and expertise to negotiate effectively with more powerful nations, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation.
To address these challenges, some experts have called for greater transparency and accountability in international trade negotiations, as well as stronger protections for the rights of workers and the environment. Others have suggested that trade agreements should include more provisions for development assistance and capacity-building, to help less developed countries become more competitive in the global marketplace.
Ultimately, the goal of international trade should be to promote economic growth and development for all countries, regardless of their relative power or resources. Achieving this goal will require a commitment to fairness and equality, as well as a willingness to address the structural imbalances that can arise from unequal trade relationships. By working together to promote greater transparency, accountability, and cooperation, countries can help to ensure that international trade serves the interests of everyone, not just the most powerful.
International trade and political inequality
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow