Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
International trade and income redistribution
International trade refers to the exchange of goods and services across borders. This process has been facilitated by advances in transportation and communication technologies, which have enabled businesses to connect with customers and suppliers around the world. However, international trade has also been associated with income redistribution, which refers to the redistribution of income from one group of people to another.
The relationship between international trade and income redistribution can be complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, international trade can increase economic growth and create new job opportunities, which can lead to higher incomes and a reduction in poverty. This is because trade enables countries to specialize in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage, which can lead to greater efficiency and productivity.
For example, a country that specializes in producing and exporting high-tech goods may be able to earn higher profits than if it were to produce goods in which it has a comparative disadvantage. This can lead to an increase in the country’s overall income and can create new job opportunities in the high-tech sector.
However, international trade can also lead to income redistribution. This is because the benefits of trade are not evenly distributed across all individuals and groups within a country. For example, workers in industries that are negatively impacted by trade may experience job losses or a reduction in wages, while workers in industries that benefit from trade may experience higher wages and increased job security.
Moreover, the distributional effects of trade can be amplified by other factors, such as differences in skill levels, education, and access to capital. For example, workers with high levels of education and skills may be more likely to benefit from trade than workers with low levels of education and skills, who may be more vulnerable to job losses and wage reductions.
In addition to the distributional effects within a country, international trade can also lead to income redistribution between countries. This is because countries with a comparative advantage in producing certain goods and services may be able to sell those goods and services at a lower price than countries that do not have a comparative advantage. This can lead to an increase in imports from the country with the comparative advantage and a decrease in imports from the country without the comparative advantage.
For example, a country that has a comparative advantage in producing textiles may be able to sell textiles at a lower price than a country that does not have a comparative advantage in textiles. This can lead to an increase in textile imports from the country with the comparative advantage and a decrease in textile imports from the country without the comparative advantage. This can lead to job losses and reduced incomes in the textile industry in the country without the comparative advantage.
Overall, international trade can have both positive and negative distributional effects on incomes within and between countries. While trade can lead to increased economic growth and job opportunities, it can also lead to income redistribution, which can have negative consequences for certain individuals and groups. Policymakers must consider these distributional effects when designing policies related to trade and must work to ensure that the benefits of trade are shared more evenly across society.
International trade and income redistribution
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow