Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
International trade and food security
International trade has become an integral part of the global food system, with food and agricultural products accounting for a significant proportion of international trade. The trade in food and agricultural products has grown rapidly in recent decades, and trade policies and agreements have become increasingly important in shaping global food systems.
Food security is a complex issue that is influenced by a variety of factors, including availability, accessibility, and affordability of food. International trade can play a critical role in ensuring food security by increasing the availability of food, reducing food prices, and improving the quality of food.
However, international trade can also create challenges for food security. Trade policies and agreements can lead to the displacement of local food producers, exacerbating food insecurity in some regions. Additionally, trade liberalization can result in the dominance of a few large multinational corporations in the food system, leading to a lack of diversity in food production and distribution.
Furthermore, international trade can have significant environmental impacts, including deforestation, loss of biodiversity, and pollution. These environmental impacts can have negative consequences for food security in the long term, as they can reduce the resilience of food systems and lead to declines in food production.
One way to address these challenges is through the implementation of policies and agreements that prioritize sustainable and equitable food systems. This includes promoting local food production, supporting small-scale farmers, and ensuring that trade policies do not undermine food security or contribute to environmental degradation.
Another important consideration is the impact of international trade on nutrition. The globalization of food systems has led to a significant shift in dietary patterns, with a greater consumption of processed and high-calorie foods. This shift has contributed to the global rise in obesity and other diet-related diseases.
To address this challenge, policies and agreements should prioritize the promotion of healthy and sustainable diets. This includes promoting the consumption of local and traditional foods, as well as reducing the availability and promotion of unhealthy foods.
In conclusion, international trade can have both positive and negative impacts on food security. While trade can increase the availability and affordability of food, it can also create challenges for local food producers, contribute to environmental degradation, and promote unhealthy dietary patterns. To address these challenges, policies and agreements must prioritize sustainable and equitable food systems that support local food production, promote healthy diets, and protect the environment.
International trade and food security
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow