International economic sanctions

International economic sanctions

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

International economic sanctions

International economic sanctions refer to a foreign policy tool used by countries or international organizations to pressure a state, group or individual to change their behavior or policies. Economic sanctions typically involve restrictions on trade, financial transactions, investments, and other economic activities with the target country. The main objective of economic sanctions is to inflict economic pain on the target country or entity, and thereby coerce them into changing their behavior or policies.

Economic sanctions can take various forms, such as trade embargoes, asset freezes, travel bans, and financial sanctions. They can be imposed by a single country, a group of countries, or an international organization such as the United Nations. The severity and scope of the sanctions depend on the specific goals and motivations of the sanctioning entity, as well as the degree of international support for the sanctions.

The history of economic sanctions can be traced back to ancient times when states used embargoes and blockades to exert economic pressure on their rivals. In modern times, economic sanctions have become a widely used foreign policy tool, particularly since the end of the Cold War. Economic sanctions have been imposed for various reasons, including to deter human rights abuses, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and aggression against neighboring countries.

One of the most notable examples of economic sanctions is the US embargo against Cuba, which has been in place since 1962. The US has also imposed economic sanctions against other countries such as Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. The European Union has imposed sanctions on Russia following its annexation of Crimea, and the UN has imposed sanctions on North Korea for its nuclear program.

The effectiveness of economic sanctions as a foreign policy tool has been a subject of debate among policymakers, scholars, and analysts. Proponents argue that economic sanctions can be an effective way to pressure rogue states and individuals to change their behavior without resorting to military force. They also argue that economic sanctions can be targeted to minimize the negative impact on innocent civilians.

However, critics argue that economic sanctions can be counterproductive, leading to economic hardship for ordinary people and entrenching the power of authoritarian regimes. Critics also point out that economic sanctions can be circumvented by black market activities and illicit financial transactions, and that they can lead to the emergence of new economic powers and trading partners that are less dependent on the sanctioning countries.

In conclusion, economic sanctions are a powerful foreign policy tool that can be used to pressure countries or entities to change their behavior or policies. However, the effectiveness of economic sanctions depends on various factors such as the severity and scope of the sanctions, the degree of international support, and the specific goals and motivations of the sanctioning entity. The debate over the effectiveness and ethical implications of economic sanctions is likely to continue as countries and international organizations continue to use this tool to achieve their foreign policy objectives.

International economic sanctions

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!