IHP630 Benchmarking Data Strategic Planning for Healthcare
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
IHP630 Benchmarking Data Strategic Planning for Healthcare
IHP630, Benchmarking, Data, Strategic, Planning, Healthcare
IHP 630 Module Six Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Benchmarking data (sometimes referred to as a scorecard) allows you to analyze how your organization is performing compared to organizations that are similar in industry and size. State and federal healthcare-related websites are a good place to search for data.
For example, if you are in the state of Indiana, you can visit the IN.gov website, where you will find information on patient procedures performed, patient discharge data, long-term care, and so on. The Indiana State Department of Health provides even more reports and statistics from A to Z. All healthcare organizations are required to report statistics to the state, which is how this information originates. Additionally, Becker’s Hospital Review provides a high-level review of the various measures that are helpful for administrators to compare.
Prompt: Benchmarking data supports strategic planning for the healthcare administrator. In your journal assignment, describe what benchmarking data you think will be the best support as a future healthcare administrator. Justify your decisions with scholarly research. Then, reflect on any parts of benchmarking data with which you are continuing to struggle.
A course journal is generally made up of many individual assignments. Journal activities in this course are private between you and the instructor. Guidelines for Submission: Your 2–3-paragraph journal assignment should follow current APA-style guidelines. Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Benchmarking Data
Description Meets “Proficient” criteria and utilizes detailed examples as support
Describes benchmarking data that will be the best support as a future healthcare administrator
Describes benchmarking data that will be the best support as a future healthcare administrator but is inaccurate and/or lacks details
Does not describe benchmarking data that will be the best support as a future healthcare administrator
Benchmarking Data Justification
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides detailed examples and/or scholarly evidence as support
Justifies decisions about which benchmarking data will be the best support
Justifies decisions about which benchmarking data will be the best support but is inaccurate and/or lacks details
Does not justify decisions about which benchmarking data will be the best support
Reflection Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides detailed examples as support
Discusses any parts of benchmarking data that cause a struggle
Discusses any parts of benchmarking data that cause a struggle but is inaccurate and/or lacks details
Does not discuss any parts of benchmarking data that cause a struggle
30
Articulation of Response
Assignment is free of errors in organization and grammar
Assignment is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow
Assignment contains errors of organization and grammar, but errors are limited enough so that assignment can be understood
Assignment contains errors of organization and grammar making the assignment difficult to understand
10
Total 100%
http://www.in.gov/isdh/26726.htm
http://www.in.gov/isdh/18888.htm
http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/40-hospital-benchmarks.html
IHP 630 Module Six Journal Guidelines and Rubric
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
IHP630 Benchmarking Data Strategic Planning for Healthcare