Table of Contents
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 | Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% | Writer Classification: PhD competent |
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours | Revision: Permitted |
Sources: 4-6 | Course Level: Masters/University College | Guarantee Status: 96-99% |
Instructions
IFS Portfolio and Narrative 3Cs of a Lifelong Learner Paper
As the course draws to a close, it is important that you reflect on your goals and activities to be able to learn from them and place their value into context. Think about the goal(s) you had set for this course. In private, reflect upon those goals and your progress toward meeting them. Were you successful? Would you change anything?
For the assignment, consider each of the pieces that you prepared and how you might explain these if you brought them in a binder to an interview or uploaded them into a digital portfolio if you should prepare one at some point in your career.
Reflect upon the following questions for THREE of the written pieces that you prepared:
What was the goal/description of the piece?
What did you have to do to prepare this piece?
What important lesson did you learn from this writing activity?Format your document in this way:
Opening paragraph that explains that this is a reflective activity featuring comments about three assignments.
- Name of the assignment
Goal/description:
What you had to do to prepare this document:
Important lesson:- Name of the assignment
Goal/description:
What you had to do to prepare this document:
Important lesson:- Name of the assignment
Goal/description:
What you had to do to prepare this document:
Important lesson:IFS Portfolio and Narrative 3Cs of a Lifelong Learner Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow