IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1
Repko, Chapter 1 & 2; Instructor Videos
- What is “interdisciplinary studies?” How does it differ from “disciplinary studies?” IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1
- Repko uses the metaphor of fruit and fruit smoothie to communicate the purpose of IDST. Briefly discuss how he does this in the beginning of Chapter 2.
- There is no “s” at the end of Revelation. It is NOT “revelations.” Briefly explain how it is one story and not a list of predictions. IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1
- In one good paragraph, summarize Trafton’s argument about how to best approach the Book of Revelation as a 21st century reader of this nearly 2,000 year-old Christian text.
- In his article “The Apocalypse of John as Oral Enactment,” David Barr explains how someone (a first century Seneca) could memorize the entire book of Revelation and recite it for an audience. There were no “chapter and verse” numbers for its intended audience as seen in modern bibles. Briefly discuss one (or more) important way(s) this changes how we think about Revelation.
- What other academic disciplines might be well-equipped to offer important insights about the book of Revelation and why? List two and explain.
a.
b.
- [OPTIONAL] Feel free to add any other insights, questions, or observations from the first 1.5 weeks of the course.
IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
IDST 390 Reflective Writing interdisciplinary studies #1