Hurst v Nissan North America Inc Essay Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Hurst v Nissan North America Inc Essay Discussion
Part One – Please write a paragraph or two on the case you liked or disliked the most in Chapters 20-26 and tell us why. Choose a case that is highlighted in the book – one that covers a page or more. (Don’t choose a “Case in Point” or other case that is mentioned in a paragraph of text – even though it might be very interesting.) Also, identify your case by the case name before you start your comments.
In your comment, briefly summarize the facts, then relate them to the legal concepts we are studying. A summary of the facts and your opinion of “fair” or “not fair” is not a legal discussion. Apply the legal concepts you are studying to what happened in the case. Then you may add your opinion to the decision if you like.
Part Two – Next, read another student’s discussion. Write a paragraph after the student’s entry with additional or contrary points regarding that student’s discussion.
A word of caution: In the past, some students have posted on a case and only described the facts and the trial court decision. Don’t forget to summarize the decision of the appellate court case we read.
A second word of caution: In the past, I’ve seen students submit incorrect summaries of a case decision (which is bad – those students lost points). But what was worse is that other students posted on the incorrect summaries – agreeing with the writer! Yikes! Be careful of that. If you think another student has the post wrong, speak up!
I will read your entries and may add some background on the cases
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Hurst v Nissan North America Inc Essay Discussion
Hurst v Nissan North America Inc Essay Discussion