Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

Pick one of the traits discussed in the following link.

Do a little research and see if you
can find more information.

Do you think the information in the link is right? Present it in
your own words in an original post.

Then respond to two other students. All citations
must be in APA format.

Any source must be cited.
http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/mythintro.html
Give response to those two students.
Student one:
It is a typical misguided judgement that a specific prevailing quality that cause a
window's peak hairline.

Like different attributes that impact hair development, different
qualities cooperate to assist with deciding the state of our hairlines.

A few specialists
accept that hair designs are heritable, so a direct relation with a widow's peak hairline
might expand your shots at having this hairline, as well.

Heredity markers in your DNA,
alongside age and sex, impact the odds that you will have a widow's peak hairline.

Most
young children have a smooth, level hairline. As they age into their teenager and adult
years, their hairlines will in general, move higher up the brows.

The presence or
nonappearance of a widow's peak hairline is simply one more illustration of our different
highlights. Age-related retreating hairline examples can likewise look like a widow's
peak in all kinds of people.

I believe this information is right as both links basically state
that the widow's peak is only a genetic feature and nothing that could be passed on in
reality. I, personally, do not have widow's peak but I am interested to know, do you?
23andMe. (n.d.). Widow's peak hairline & genetics. 23andMe.
https://www.23andme.com/topics/traits/widows-peak/.
Student two:
Like a lot of my fellow students, I was always taught that tongue rolling is genetic and
that only so many people could perform the task.

After doing research over the topic, it
is obvious that nothing about tongue rolling is genetic; actually, people can teach
themselves how to do it.

There was a study done on identical twins where both were
asked to roll their tongues and only one twin could do it.

This proves that tongue rolling
is not genetic, because if it was, both twins would be able to do it.

I always thought that I
was special because I could do so, but now I know that is not the case!

Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

Human Genetics Myths Case Study Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!