How Have Serial Killer Motives Changed Over The Years

How Have Serial Killer Motives Changed Over The Years

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

How Have Serial Killer Motives Changed Over The Years

Topic: How have serial killer motives changed over the years? H. H. Holmes vs Ted Bundy

Paper details: Purpose: This essay is an exercise in practicing the research skills that we have spent the semester learning into a single, beautiful research paper. Task: Your assignment is to write a research paper in support of a central, evidence-based claim that addresses any topic. Your main goal is to contribute to some scholarly conversation based on the content of this course. For this research paper, you will be required to conduct research from peer-reviewed sources and other scholarly sources. Keep in mind that research is driven by questions and problems, not by conclusions you want to prove true. Your paper should be no shorter than seven (meaning seven full pages!) pages and no longer than 11. This does not include a title page or your works cited page, the latter of which should be on a new page following your conclusion with the heading “Works Cited.” Criteria: A successful paper will have: Intro They say/I say move (here’s where your TS goes) Research (one of the models we covered in class) A naysayer, followed by a rebuttal Conclusions + implications of conclusions (what does it mean?) note: please do not start this paragraph with the words “In conclusion.” I know you can get more creative than that. Your thesis statement should be clear, arguable, and include a so-what statement. I strongly suggest you employ one of the thesis statement methods that we covered in class: In this essay I will argue . . . (note – you can’t argue how something. You can only argue that something. Check your TS for language just in case!) This is important because . . . OR “The significance of my research will show . . .” I expect you to follow the upside-down triangle method that we covered in class for introductions or follow suggestions from chapter 1 of They Say (or a combination of the two [perhaps best]) and the triangle conclusion method. I also expect paragraplryhs that follow the AXES structure.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow How Have Serial Killer Motives Changed Over The Years

How Have Serial Killer Motives Changed Over The Years

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!