How has research on human subjects changed?
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
HUMAN SUBJECTS: How has research on human subjects changed?
- Open and read the Current Code:
- At the Library, research an academic article (i.e. peer-reviewed) of a scientific experiment with human subjects that would VIOLATE CURRENT APA ETHICAL STANDARDS
- Briefly summarize your experiment in a post. Include a summary of the study itself (topic, method, results) as well as why you think this study is unethical
- Now listen to the following podcast:
- Trust engineers– MP3 (30.5 MB)
and discuss whether or not Facebook was conducting unethical research, and how you personally feel as a potential research subject
- Finally, be sure to respond to two other’s posts throughout the week
Your post should:
- Explain why your experiment would be considered unethical by today’s standards
- Maximum two pages
- Provide APA style reference (Author, Year Published, Title of Article, Journal Name)
- Use your own words (i.e. no quotes and do not plagiarize)
- Provide a 1-2 page summary of the study, what ethics code violation you believe occurred, as well as any valuable findings from the study, in addition to your response to the Facebook research
- Provide a research post and a minimum of two (2) posts to other students’ posts. Ideally, 4 posts for full credit. Please see grading rubric in course outline.
- Threaded discussions are designed to enhance your critical thinking and research skills. Your posts should be dispersed throughout the week.
Please refer to your course outline for more information concerning this assignment.
- Discussion Board Rubric– Word Document (13.4 KB)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow How has research on human subjects changed?