How has research on human subjects changed?

How has research on human subjects changed?

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct

HUMAN SUBJECTS: How has research on human subjects changed?

1. Open and read the Current Code:

• APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct– PDF (223 KB)

2. At the Library, research an academic article (i.e. peer-reviewed) of a scientific experiment with human subjects that would VIOLATE CURRENT APA ETHICAL STANDARDS
3. Briefly summarize your experiment in a post. Include a summary of the study itself (topic, method, results) as well as why you think this study is unethical
4. Now listen to the following podcast:

• Trust engineers– MP3 (30.5 MB)

and discuss whether or not Facebook was conducting unethical research, and how you personally feel as a potential research subject

5. Finally, be sure to respond to two other’s posts throughout the week

Your post should:

• Explain why your experiment would be considered unethical by today’s standards
• Maximum two pages
• Provide APA style reference (Author, Year Published, Title of Article, Journal Name)
• Use your own words (i.e. no quotes and do not plagiarize)
• Provide a 1-2 page summary of the study, what ethics code violation you believe occurred, as well as any valuable findings from the study, in addition to your response to the Facebook research
• Provide a research post and a minimum of two (2) posts to other students’ posts. Ideally, 4 posts for full credit. Please see grading rubric in course outline.
• Threaded discussions are designed to enhance your critical thinking and research skills. Your posts should be dispersed throughout the week.

Please refer to your course outline for more information concerning this assignment.

• Discussion Board Rubric– Word Document (13.4 KB)

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow How has research on human subjects changed?

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!