Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References Number of Pages 10 Pages Quality Level 100% Spacing Double
Address the following questions:
What other strategic processes are closely tied to ERM?
What three kinds of risks are identified within the City of Edmonton?
What two criteria must be balanced in a successful ERM model?
Who is responsible for dealing with and mitigating risks?
To what body must the Citys strategic risks be reported?
Major Homework Requirements
The homework assignments are not opinion compositions, or a book, chapter, or article review. These assignments are positional arguments that are entirely supported by empirical evidence and well-known industry facts. You can include your personal experiences and ideas if it directly relates to the topic, or reinforces your position. However, you must support all statements with evidence. All submissions must adhere to APA guidelines. APA writing is an academic standard; therefore, it is not optional, it is mandatory.
Although you should use multiple references, the required course textbook must be the primarily reference source.
Points are deducted if your submission does not adhere to the following requirements:
Be a scholarly submission
Include a title page
Times New Roman font, 1-inch margin, and double-spaced
Be at least two pages in length
Should not consist of any bullet-points
Have a reference page with at least three academic references
You CANNOT use Wikipedia, LinkedIn articles, blogs, paid vendors, certification websites, or similar sources in academic writing. You CAN use reputable industry articles from publications similar to ComputerWeekly, PCMag, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or similar sources. Academic journals and popular industry articles are accessible in the universitys library databases and Google Scholar. All references should not have a publication date older than 2005.
Be written in a clear and concise manner
Contains contractual phrases, as an example shouldn’t” “couldn’t” or “didn’t, or similar
Uses vague words such as “proper,” “appropriate,” “adequate,” or similar to describe a process, function, or a procedure.
As an example, “proper incident response plan,” “appropriate IT professional,” “adequate security,” or similar. These words are subjective because they have a different meaning to different individuals.
Does not adhere to the University’s academic dishonesty and plagiarism policies.
Institution Release Statement
Criteria 0 – 1 Points 2 – 3 Point 4 – 5 Points Total Professional communication Unprofessional communication; many errors; no APA Minor grammar, spelling, and APA errors Postings are professional and in standard written English with APA Complete addressing of assessment criteria Criteria not fully addressed Minimal response to criteria; minor aspects missing All criteria are fully addressed Evidence of critical thinking or extending information Critical thinking or extending information not evident Obvious responses to questions; little thought evident Posts demonstrate critical thinking with evidence base from research or experience Course connections. No connections provided Minimal connections provided to readings/activities Clear connections to readings/activities Submitted an overview / summary of the case selected for analysis. Also identified those procedural steps to be analyzed. Did not provide an adequate overview or summary of the selected case or failed to identify those steps to be analyzed. Provides an adequate overview or summary of the selected case and steps to be analyzed though may not be clear or complete. Case overview is clearly presented including all appropriate investigative steps to be analyzed. TOTAL /25