Health Care Law Research Paper

Health Care Law Research Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Health Care Law Research Paper

Health, Care, Law, Research, Paper

 

1. Two paragraphs of not less than 15-sentence each discussing the board question. You may want to use the first paragraph to explain what are the quality of life measures, and the second to embark in your opinion. (60 points)
2. You must comment on at least one other student discussion post. This response must contain not less than 10 sentences. (30 points)
   What is your opinion of using quality of life measurements?

Please include the name of the person or question to which you are replying in the subject line. For example, “Tom’s response to Susan’s comment.”

Also please reply to another students comment below

Ashlee:

There are seven measurements that can be taken when determining someone’s quality of life. The first one being the overall general health of the patient that is being evaluated and this to me would be when the family doctor would look at all aspects from a health standpoint. The next one is physical functioning is the patient able to work, do normal activities, are they able to daily chores they would normally do.

These are the questions I would be asking to measure the physical functioning. Role limitations is the next step, and this would include the family structure. Is the in my eyes would be how involved is the family in care and what type of family there is. Pain is the next step and if you have a patient who is on long term pain medication this may be hard to measure. Social function to me is one of the most important measures because what keeps us happy and living is our friends and family.

Is the patient going outside and socializing are they making the effort to see friends, and this goes hand in hand with the next step being vitality. Vitality is the state of being strong and active and having energy and this one goes hand in hand with the next step being mental health. I believe the mind is the most powerful tool we own, but mental health is a very strong step.

I think it is good to use these measures so that the patient can get the proper help they need. I think it needs to be a team effort though not just one person or provider making the call on what the measurements are. I think the family doctor or internal medicine doctor needs to be involved but also a psychologist, nurse and also at some point the family if available. It should be an all over evaluation where everyone is evolved.

Most of the time these measurements of life are done because a patient is ill or heading in a direction where they would need Palliative Care.  I think that this is part of the medical world and while we don’t like hearing that someone is being measured on their quality of life it is only there to benefit the patient and provide the help they may need.

 

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Health Care Law Research Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!