goals and objectives of sentencing

goals and objectives of sentencing

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

goals and objectives of sentencing

Topic: Sentencing

Learning Objectives

• Know the goals and objectives of sentencing.
• Understand the concept of proportionality in sentencing and describe how the Supreme Court has applied this concept in its review of sentencing cases.
• Identify the various types of sentences, including intermediate, indeterminate, determinate, and mandatory sentences, and elucidate the reasons behind “get tough” reforms such as habitual offender statutes.
• Be aware of the process of arriving at a sentence and the potential problems of disparities and discrimination in sentencing.
• Describe the current status of the death penalty, the Supreme Court’s rulings on capital punishment, and the arguments put forth in support of and against the death penalty.
• Grasp the process for appellate review of sentences.

1. Explain the goals of sentencing.
2. Using examples, describe the types of sentencing.
3. What steps can courts take to make sure sentencing is free of discrimination and disparate treatment?

goals and objectives of sentencing

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow goals and objectives of sentencing

goals and objectives of sentencing

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!