Four Global Social Work Values Reflection

Four Global Social Work Values Reflection

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Four Global Social Work Values Reflection

PURPOSE

The purpose of this reflection assignment is to look at the four global social work values and values dimensions through a different lens.

INSTRUCTIONS

Using the information from your reading this week and the TED Talks you watched, think about how you can look at the four global social work values and values dimensions through a different lens. Reflect on how you think these four values fit with the social work values as you understand them and address how they apply to one of the TED Talks you were assigned to watch.
Then, write a substantive reflection in approximately 500 words. In your reflection address the questions and criteria in this assignment. Reference your sources appropriately according to APA guidelines. You may use 1st person in this assignment.

Include in your reflection:

What are the four global social work values presented by Verschelden (p. 559)?

How do you see them fitting or not fitting with social work values as you currently understand them?

Discuss how each of these values is relevant to one of the Ted talks you reviewed for the week.

Now discuss the same Ted talk in terms of the social work value dimensions presented by Dubrin (p. 560 – 561) explaining which dimension of each you think the presenter is coming from.

Four Global Social Work Values Reflection

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Four Global Social Work Values Reflection

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!