Feminist and disability theory assignment

Feminist and disability theory assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions  

Feminist and disability theory assignment

Analytical Reading Response (ARR) Assignment

This assignment asks you to analytically respond to the main idea(s) introduced in

course readings and may be submitted in response to readings assigned on Monday and/ or Wednesday. Your ARR should identify a main theme or idea and discuss that theme or idea as it relates to each of the assigned readings. Your ARR should clearly reflect the different contributions made by each author. Direct quotes are strongly encouraged and must be cited (see example below).

Specifically, each ARR should:

Identify a theme or idea that can be related to each reading assigned for that day

Discuss the contribution each author makes to the theme/idea

Be at least 3, but no more than 5 paragraphs

Due Dates & Submission Information:

ARR due dates correspond with the dates that readings are assigned EXAMPLE: You may submit an ARR on Monday, Sept. 10, it should address readings by Johnson, Smith & Crunkista

In-Text Citation Format

Direct quotes and paraphrased ideas should be cited in-text as follows: “Feminist and disability theory also share a deep concern about the body and

bodily difference” (Hirschmann 2012: 397).

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Feminist and disability theory assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!