Feminist and disability theory assignment
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Feminist and disability theory assignment
Analytical Reading Response (ARR) Assignment
This assignment asks you to analytically respond to the main idea(s) introduced in
course readings and may be submitted in response to readings assigned on Monday and/ or Wednesday. Your ARR should identify a main theme or idea and discuss that theme or idea as it relates to each of the assigned readings. Your ARR should clearly reflect the different contributions made by each author. Direct quotes are strongly encouraged and must be cited (see example below).
Specifically, each ARR should:
Identify a theme or idea that can be related to each reading assigned for that day
Discuss the contribution each author makes to the theme/idea
Be at least 3, but no more than 5 paragraphs
Due Dates & Submission Information:
ARR due dates correspond with the dates that readings are assigned EXAMPLE: You may submit an ARR on Monday, Sept. 10, it should address readings by Johnson, Smith & Crunkista
In-Text Citation Format
Direct quotes and paraphrased ideas should be cited in-text as follows: “Feminist and disability theory also share a deep concern about the body and
bodily difference” (Hirschmann 2012: 397).
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Feminist and disability theory assignment