Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

Exploring, “Man Box”, Research, Discussion Responses

 

1. well  to know if an article or book is credible it would be considered a scholarly (peer reviewed) . This contains articles that have been reviewed then critiqued by people in the related field. That way readers can have the confidence that what they are reading holds up to some kind of creditability. Ways that I can check if it is credible is If I turn to the editorial policy page and check if the editors state that the journal contains peer reviewed articles. Or I can just use Kean data bases to be extra sure. I am not sure how to post an article?

My topic will be about exploring the “Man Box” and case and effect of toxic masculinity. The Journal I am referencing too is called toxic masculinity and mental health by Angelique Jenney Journal. Three features that suggest it is peer viewed is: the title has the word journal in it. Secondly its start with a title abstract. Lastly, because there vocabulary and terms they used. For example, The journal never said boys, kids, teen, guys. They used terms such as Men and young Men.

2. In order to know if an article or book is a credible or peer-reviewed academic source, it would be descried as scholarly.  The following are features or elements of an article or book one can use to evaluate whether or not it is credible : a “doi,” an abstract, a method section, does the author have a PhD? My topic is regarding racism and colorism, specifically in the western world.  The article posted, related to my topic is an example of a peer-reviewed article because it has an abstract,  it was posted by the Society for the Psychological studies of Social Issues, and it has a “doi.”
3. In order to know if an article is peer-reviewed or from an academic source it must contains critics from experts related to the field. Another aspect that we can closely analyze is the tittle; if it contains academic words on its tittle we can definitively say it is credible. For instance, my topic is in the meteorology field; the are multiple authors for this article and its tittle is ” Examination of Nudging Schemes in the Simulation of Meteorology for Use in Air Quality Experiments: Application in the Great Lakes Region”, with this title is more than evident that it is a credible and reliable research. Moreover, this article contains an abstract; which makes it even more reliable.
4. Determining whether an article or book is a credible  / a scholarly source has a lot of factors in my opinion. In my opinion, whatever topic you are researching and whatever sources you are using needs experts in the field. Anyone can give their input, but someone who is credible and an expert in the matter at hand contains more credibility. Another thing I look for is the references and resources used to generate the article / book. And finally, looking further into the author and title of the book / article. Further researching the author can show more background information and allow for more credibility. The title should also be relevant to the topic at hand.
5. To know if an article or book is a credible peer-reviewed academic source is if it would be considered a scholarly. Scholarly or peer reviewed sources most likely has to have people who are directly in the field of the topic. it would be very difficult to talk about something you don’t really know about. A scholarly article always starts off with an abstract that talks about what the article will consist of and at the end of the abstract are the key words which are in bold. Another thing that can help credibility is further research of the author. Searching to see what the author has done in the past has build credibility for them. Sources are also key as they have to be done properly as they have to be up to date.

 

 

 

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!