Experience Writing and Administrating Paper

Experience Writing and Administrating Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Experience Writing and Administrating Paper

 

The conceptual variable I chose is leadership, also known as a trait which are personality variables. Personality variables usually do not vary and if they do it is very slow (Stangor, 2015). While writing the Likert-scale questionnaire I was thinking about what makes a good leader.

Therefore, the questions I wrote are formatted in a way that could figure out if someone has a leadership personality. This was the easy part because I believe there is a lot of qualities that make up a good leader. Administering the scale was quite simple I had my husband, my cousin, and my best friend complete the scale.

I chose them because my husband is a natural-born leader, my cousin has leadership skills however she would rather not make the ultimate decisions, and for my best friend she is a teacher and her leadership style are different.

Conceptual variable to Measured Variable

Measuring leadership as a characteristic of one’s personality can be difficult. I believe that my Likert scale has made it easy to see if participants have a leadership trait by the questions I asked. If the participant answers that they strongly agree to the statement “I avoid making decisions” that would be one factor against the leadership trait.

Reliability and Validity

The strengths in my scale concerning reliability is that leadership traits rarely change or if they do it is very slow, so if a test-retest approach was done it would have consistent responses proving reliable. Limitations concerning reliability in the leadership scale could be reactivity also know as retesting effects.

Retesting effects are participants remembering the test and answering them the exact same way without even considering a change, that way they do not seem inconsistent (Stangor, 2015). This would cause limitations concerning the reliability of the leadership scale.

Strengths in the leadership scale concerning validity is that the questions on the scale are referenced to the content of what makes a leader. “Content validity is the extent to which the measured variables appear to have adequately covered the full domain of the conceptual variable (Stangor, 2015).”

Having questions based on content helps make the scale result in valid data. However, limitations to the leadership scale concerning content validity is that leadership can be described in many ways and left up to self-interpretations.

Reference:

Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.) Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Experience Writing and Administrating Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!