Ethical Reporting: Navigating Professional Dilemmas solution

Ethical Reporting: Navigating Professional Dilemmas

Table of Contents

Toggle

Instructions

Ethical Reporting: Navigating Professional Dilemmas

1)  believe that Dr. Martinson made the correct professional steps in addressing this issue with his client Sara. Its

obvious that Dr. Martinson is a sympathetic, concerned professional who wants to do right by his client. The decision

Dr. Martinson made by not going to his accused colleague and going directly to the Department of Social Services to

report the child abuse and also to the state licensure board for professional counselors to report the alleged sexual

activity between the former counselor, the client, and her son was the right choice to make. If Dr. Martinson addressed

the situation directly to the accused counselor by himself this could of caused many other issues plus could also be

violating the professional code of ethics. This is a professional way of lodging complaint and Dr. Martinson did exactly

that, not confronting directly with the counselor. Now the Department of Social Services and the state licensure board

for professional counselors will better handle the case. If I was in this position of Dr. Martinson, I would have done the

same. I probably would have gone a step further by making a report with the police as well.

 

• As a mandated reporter, Dr. Martinson was justified in his course of action. Due to the nature of the allegations, it is important to report the conduct of his colleague, and follow the Code of Ethics set in place. If Dr. Martinson had not followed the Code of Ethics, the legal ramification for his self, and the company would be in jeopardy, all trust of therapist within this organization who be questioned or lost. By calling the Department of Human Services, along with the State License Board for counselors, Dr. Martinson protected the well being of the client, and possibly other children etcetera from abuse. This shows that Dr. Martinson care for his clients, and upholds the integrity of his Code of Ethics. The colleague in question, violated his clients personal boundaries, sexually abused a child, and broke the Code of Ethics, both legally and personally.

Ethical Reporting: Navigating Professional Dilemmas

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!